Share |

Creation Tries to Be Cute

Don’t bitch about this to much, I was just bored :/ Once upon a time before time had even begun An immaterial being got all things done He made there be light – before making the sun Because hes almighty and thought thatd be fun In just 3 days he made, the earth and the seas And the grass and the plants and all the fruit trees But wait, without Sun how would the seeds grow ? Never mind that, hes God , thats all I need to know Then he made the sun the moon and the stars But I dont think he mentioned anything about Mars He just threw them in heaven where they were to stay And dont sell me no stories about Mily Way So here ends the fourth day and right after that he made fowls and whales and cattle and what not Which were not made to evolve but were made just like that Then God pulls the best trick he had up his sleeve : He makes Adam from dirt, and Eve from Adams rib They were made in his image, I know this for a fact ..I wonder where Gods belly button is at . They were given a garden but theres a catch, you see In the middle of it there was this tree Of knowledge of good and evil, from which they must not Eat, as we all know that knowledge is bad But Eve was tempted by a bad snake from Hell She ate the fruit and made Adam eat it as well And this is why now there is cancer and Aids And we must deny science and hate on the gays And prays our righteous and alloving God Who killed everybody during the flood And I have a book to prove this you know It was written thousands of

  1. krustofskie
    October 13th, 2010 at 23:29 | #1

    @kuvtsisnyiamkoj Classification of species is not done by similarities alone, not anymore that is. Similarities are a good indication of relation but not the be all and end all as some have been found to be wrong.
    We now have a much better understanding of the relations from one species to the next and a very competent “family tree” of species by looking at the DNA evidence.

  2. kuvtsisnyiamkoj
    October 14th, 2010 at 04:38 | #2

    @krustofskie
    That’s my point exactly. DNA is nothing more than a blueprint.
    A Ford and A Honda can have very similar design blueprint.
    They are not necessarily related though.

    It is quite obvious that DNA does not really reveal origin BUT
    rather the blueprint of the certain creature only.

  3. krustofskie
    October 14th, 2010 at 05:47 | #3

    @kuvtsisnyiamkoj You want to deny DNA as evidence for family relations even though it has been proven correct?
    How about looking at when you couple together all the different types of evidence, you will find that they back each other up. All the different types agree with each other and can create a near perfect family tree.
    Fossil evidence, DNA, RNA, evidence from proteins, vestigial and atavistic organs, embryology, biogeography, homology, bacteriology, virology, immunology, pest-control.

  4. kuvtsisnyiamkoj
    October 14th, 2010 at 14:13 | #4

    @krustofskie
    You need to realize that evidences can be misleading.
    Evidences can cleary be stacking up but detrimental to the real truth.

  5. Spinprovisation
    October 30th, 2010 at 18:00 | #5

    I must believe, in an atom ‘r’ a sum, Heisenberg believed it would equate to less than 1, but 1 in not what we tend to believe, A speed at 1 is infinite in power, but evolutionists say, no God could hold such a power.

    So either, God or Einstein, hold this infinite allure, all I know is no mortal is sure.

    So If My God nor My Mentor will not put me to shame,I cry out, humbly, plz put us all to shame.

    As I place my last dime upon chance, I know my God flips coins as mere happenstance.

  6. rick92rr
    November 6th, 2010 at 19:14 | #6

    @kuvtsisnyiamkoj well, those are things created by humans, but in evolution what you are talking about is life and the complex chain that it rolls today, our dna contains genes exactly as other espicies do, so…

  7. kuvtsisnyiamkoj
    November 6th, 2010 at 19:52 | #7

    @rick92rr
    That is what I am saying.
    Blueprints for cars evolve.
    And the blueprints have a lot of
    similar stuff like engines, axles, brakes, a/c, etc…
    Does that make a TOYOTA and FORD from the same source.
    No!

  8. macnutz
    November 8th, 2010 at 03:36 | #8

    ha, that was good.

  9. swordnquil
    November 9th, 2010 at 13:08 | #9

    God didn’t give us morals. According to Genesis, Satan did. Morals are the ability to know what is right and what is wrong. But God didn’t want A and E to KNOW what was right and what was wrong. That’s why he said not to eat from the fruit of that one tree. Satan tempted them into doing it. God didn’t want them to know. Satan did. So basically, original sin? Morality.

  10. genericnameboi91
    December 6th, 2010 at 07:07 | #10

    @swordnquil Does that mean I can continue to eat babies without guilt? NICE! Thanks for the insight!

  11. swordnquil
    December 6th, 2010 at 07:17 | #11

    @genericnameboi91 Totally, but I’d recommend some really high-end hot-sauce. Babies tend to be a little bland, what with all those strained peas and infant formula. I’ve found that just a touch of hot sauce brings out the natural flavoring perfectly. And I’d suggest a nice white wine to go with it. Red just doesn’t cut it.

    Might I suggest a nice strangled-kitten a la mode for dessert? The younger the better. Adult cats are just too tough and stringy.

  12. genericnameboi91
    December 7th, 2010 at 23:25 | #12

    @swordnquil I like your style stranger.

  13. swordnquil
    December 7th, 2010 at 23:40 | #13

    @genericnameboi91 Thanks! Hey, someone has to tell the world what we atheists do behind closed doors, right?

    Except for that thing about the chickens. No, that’d probably be too much. Definitely.

  14. genericnameboi91
    December 9th, 2010 at 19:35 | #14

    @swordnquil No no, that’s for us to know and celebrate, and for them to never find out.

  15. jerrypz
    February 13th, 2011 at 21:10 | #15

    Excellent video! How can anyone take Genesis seriously? The only way I can see it is that God’s the bad guy because he set up the two – by definition – most innocent people in history. Why would they, without knowledge of good & evil, disbelieve in a talking snake (?!) that the all-good god created? Then god blames them for choosing what is a random option! And people believe GOD was the good guy. Arrrgh!!

  16. 1982mockingbird1982
    March 17th, 2011 at 13:56 | #16

    Freaking awesome!

  17. rmcdaniel423
    May 21st, 2011 at 10:38 | #17

    @swordnquil I never thought of it that way, but your point about morality coming from ‘satan’, rather than god, is intriguing. You’re absolutely right. His highest objective, and the whole reason for dooming humanity to hell, is that he tried to withhold knowledge from us. I’ll keep that little card up my sleeve for future debates with creatards who think there can be no such thing as right and wrong without their version of god.

  18. Zobaire90
    June 23rd, 2011 at 13:25 | #18

    @ZOMGitsCriss i dont know why you try so much to disprove Gods existence because if you know that there is no God, then we all lose nothing. the dude (including me) that believes in God will be at the same position as you after death, if there is no God. i find Atheist attitude towards God a bit weird. it would make sense for a believer in God to go through all the trouble to prove Gods existence, but not you(atheist). you dont achieve much except hatred towards yourself. so the question is why?

  19. mylovewelch
    July 1st, 2011 at 19:32 | #19

    this is so cute I love the way you perceive the world around us.

  20. mythmanjay
    September 10th, 2011 at 21:36 | #20

    Funny, how–of all the people to watch this video (not to mention the ones who responded)–I am the FIRST to say it is ‘cute’ in the reactions. I wonder if that’s because they’re all anarchists daring to defy our cute Queen, or because they’re all using ‘the secret weapon of Theists against Satan’: indifference (secret to even the Theists themselves)

  21. MisterDataJack
    September 19th, 2011 at 16:53 | #21

    @kuvtsisnyiamkoj No one “believes in” evolution. Belief is for religiously deluded folks. People who understand evolution, and the evidence that supports it, accept it as true. Your silly car analogy aptly demonstrates that you do not understand evolution.

    Cars do not reproduce. Reproduction is the key to evolution, as individuals do not evolve, populations do.

  22. kuvtsisnyiamkoj
    September 19th, 2011 at 23:30 | #22

    @MisterDataJack
    Hey, you missing the point. What about similar bacterias created in the laboratory by different scientists.
    They reproduce. The point is that similarities does not make you a group. Just because two separate bacteria species are alike does not make them come from the same group.

  23. MisterDataJack
    September 20th, 2011 at 00:04 | #23

    @kuvtsisnyiamkoj True, similar morphology doesn’t guarantee similar lineage, but it suggests it. Then we confirm it by using a host of other methods – check their DNA for ERVs, check for bone shape and type, check internal organ location, size, shape, and type, etc.

    Common descent and speciation are regular, expected, and inevitable consequences of reproduction.

    Scientists do not “create” bacteria “in the laboratory”. They modify existing bacteria through gene manipulation/insertion.

  24. TokyoGeisha21
    October 12th, 2011 at 16:00 | #24

    @swordnquil I thought god created the tree with the magical fruit. Why would he create the fruit in the first place if he knew….yeah…ok.

  25. TheJimcat
    November 6th, 2011 at 16:52 | #25

    1000th comment!: i love what u did there an i have a huge crush on u lol
    -looks at “god tells it like it is”- i shall go watch that now

  1. January 20th, 2012 at 18:22 | #1
  2. January 20th, 2012 at 18:25 | #2
  3. January 20th, 2012 at 18:58 | #3

CommentLuv badge